Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/2311
Title: Clinical management of Australian adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias: A national population-based study
Authors: Anazodo, A.
Walker, R.
Thompson, K.
White, V. M.
Skaczkowski, G.
Pinkerton, R.
Coory, M.
Osborn, M.
Bibby, H.
Nicholls, W.
Orme, L. M.
Conyers, R.
Phillips, M. B.
Harrup, R.
Issue Date: 2018
Source: 65, (11), 2018
Journal: Pediatric Blood and Cancer
Abstract: Background: While several studies have examined the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), studies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are rare. Using national data for Australia, we describe (i) the number and type of treatment centers caring for AYAs, (ii) induction/first-line treatments, and (iii) survival outcomes. Procedure: National population-based study assessing treatment of 15- to 24-year-olds diagnosed with ALL or AML between 2007 and 2012. Treatment details were abstracted from hospital medical records. Treatment centers were classified as pediatric or adult (adult AYA-focused or other adult; and by AYA volume [high/low]). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses examined associations between treatment and overall, event-free, and relapse-free survival outcomes. Results: Forty-seven hospitals delivered induction therapy to 351 patients (181 ALL and 170 AML), with 74 (21%) treated at pediatric centers; 70% of hospitals treated less than two AYA leukemia patients per year. Regardless of treatment center, 82% of ALL patients were on pediatric protocols. For AML, pediatric protocols were not used in adult centers, with adult centers using a non-COG 7+3-type induction protocol (51%, where COG is Cooperative Oncology Group) or an ICE-type protocol (39%, where ICE is idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide). Exploratory analyses suggested that for both ALL and AML, AYAs selected for adult protocols have worse overall, event-free, and relapse-free survival outcomes. Conclusions: Pediatric protocols were commonly used for ALL patients regardless of where they are treated, indicating rapid assimilation of recent evidence by Australian hematologists. For AML, pediatric protocols were only used at pediatric centers. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal treatment approach for AYA AML patients.L6240010142018-09-26
2018-10-02
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27349
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L624001014&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.27349 |
Keywords: young adult;arseniccytarabine;etoposide;idarubicin;acute lymphoblastic leukemia;acute myeloid leukemia;adolescent;adult;article;Australian;cancer combination chemotherapy;cancer survival;clinical protocol;event free survival;exploratory research;female;high volume hospital;human;induction chemotherapy;low volume hospital;major clinical study;male;overall survival;pediatric hospital;priority journal;recurrence free survival;stem cell transplantation
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Mar 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.