Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/193
Title: | A combined randomised and observational study of surgery for fractures in the distal radius in the elderly (CROSSFIRE)-a study protocol | Authors: | Bingham, Roger Latendresse, Kim Mittal, Rajat Harris, Ian A. Wong, James Rieger, Bertram Xuan, Wei Elkinson, Ilia Sungaran, Jai Lawson, Andrew Mulford, Jonathan Buchbinder, Rachelle Incoll, Ian Smith, Paul Tran, Phong Naylor, Justine M. Yates, Piers Howard, Kirsten Kim, Woosung Viswanathan, Sameer Chehade, Mellick Page, Richard Hau, Raphael Balogh, Zsolt Vafa, Arezoo Shrestha, Kush Richardson, Martin Smith, Geoff Ivers, Rebecca Drobetz, Herwig Loveridge, Jeremy |
Issue Date: | 2017 | Source: | 7, (6), 2017, p. e016100-e016100 | Pages: | e016100-e016100 | Journal: | BMJ Open | Abstract: | Fractures of the distal radius are common and occur in all age groups. The incidence is high in older populations due to osteoporosis and increased falls risk. Considerable practice variation exists in the management of distal radius fractures in older patients ranging from closed reduction with cast immobilisation to open reduction with plate fixation. Plating is currently the most common surgical treatment. While there is evidence showing no significant advantage for some forms of surgical fixation over conservative treatment, and no difference between different surgical techniques, there is a lack of evidence comparing two of the most common treatments used: closed reduction and casting versus plating. Surgical management involves significant costs and risks compared with conservative management. High-level evidence is required to address practice variation, justify costs and to provide the best clinical outcomes for patients.; Methods and Analysis: This pragmatic, multicentre randomised comparative effectiveness trial aims to determine whether plating leads to better pain and function and is more cost-effective than closed reduction and casting of displaced distal radius fractures in adults aged 60 years and older. The trial will compare the two techniques but will also follow consenting patients who are unwilling to be randomised in a separate, observational cohort. Inclusion of non-randomised patients addresses selection bias, provides practice and outcome insights about standard care, and improves the generalisability of the results from the randomised trial.; Ethics and Dissemination: CROSSFIRE(Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Surgery for Fractures In the distal Radius in the Elderly) was reviewed and approved by The Hunter New England HREC (HNEHREC Reference No: 16/02/17/3.04). The results of the trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated via various forms of media. Results will be incorporated in clinical recommendations and practice guidelines produced by professional bodies.; Registration: CROSSFIRE has been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR: ACTRN12616000969460).; © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 23. ; Original Imprints: Publication: [London] : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2011- | DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016100 | Resources: | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,athens&db=mdc&AN=28645976&site=eds-live | Keywords: | AgedCost-benefit;Fracture Fixation;PatientReported Outcome;Radius Fractures | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Sunshine Coast HHS Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.