Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1903
Title: | Amoxycillin-clavulanate vs azithromycin for respiratory exacerbations of bronchiectasis in children-a multi-centre double blind non-inferiority randomised controlled trial | Authors: | Marchant, J. Van Asperen, P. Ware, R. Morris, P. Masters, I. B. McCallum, G. Champion, A. Buntain, H. Mackay, I. Sloots, T. P. Ungerer, J. Binks, M. Chang, Anne Goyal, V. Grimwood, K. Byrnes, C. A. Torzillo, P. O'Grady, K. |
Issue Date: | 2018 | Source: | 197, (MeetingAbstracts), 2018 | Journal: | American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | Abstract: | Rationale: Based on limited available data, current guidelines recommended amoxycillinclavulanate as the first-line empirical oral-antibiotic therapy for non-severe exacerbations of bronchiectasis in children. However, amoxycillin-clavulanate requires multiple dosing per day and causes gastrointestinal symptoms in many children. Oral azithromycin is attractive alternative firstline therapy because of its long half-life, markedly reduced dosing schedule, and good tolerance. Our primary question was “Is daily oral azithromycin non-inferior (within a 20% margin) to oral amoxycillin-clavulanate at achieving resolution of exacerbations by day-21 of treatment?” Methods: We conducted a multicentre, parallel group, double-dummy, double-blind placebo RCT with concealed allocation between April 2012 to August 2016 at 4 centres (Brisbane, Sydney, Darwin and Auckland). Primary outcome was resolution of exacerbation (defined as 'return to baseline') by 21-days. Secondary outcomes were cough-specific quality of life (PC-QoL), duration and time to next exacerbation, and microbiological data from deep nasal swabs. A lower limit of the 95%CI for relative difference in percentage cured between amoxycillin-clavulanate and azithromycin above 0.8 provided non-inferiority. When possible, bloods and spirometry were also obtained. Results: Baseline characteristics of the groups (amoxycillin-clavulanate, n=97 and azithromycin, n=82) were similar. By day-21, exacerbation resolution was comparable between the 2 groups, (relative risk 0.99 CI 0.84, 1.17,) falling within the non-inferiority margin. Betweengroup difference for duration of exacerbation (2-days 95%CI -1.7, 5.3) and PC-QoL at day-21 (0.42, 95%CI -0.06, 0.89) compared to beginning of exacerbation was also similar. Median duration to next exacerbation was similar: amoxycillin-clavulanate (84 days) azithromycin (81 days, p=0.78). Number of children exiting study protocol to start open label antibiotics because of severe adverse effects was higher in children in the azithromycin group (12/82, 14.6%), compared to amoxycillin-clavulanate (9/95, 9.5%) but the difference was not significant (RR 1.55, 95%CI 0.69, 3.48). Of the 147 children where virus data were available, 67 (45.6%) had a virus identified (34/77 in amoxycillin-clavulanate group and 33/70 in azithromycin group. Rhinovirus was the most common (50/67) followed by parainfluenza (n=8). Conclusion: This is the first to provide data that azithromycin is non-inferior to amoxicillin-clavulanate for treating non-severe exacerbations of bronchiectasis in children. Azithromycin may be preferred to amoxicillin-clavulanate in selected settings e.g. adherence. However, its use needs to be balanced with risk of treatment failure (within 20% compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate) and inducing macrolide resistance. Before azithromycin can substitute amoxycillin-clavulanate for exacerbations, a larger study with a smaller non-inferiority margin is required. (Table Presented) .L6229649382018-07-16 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L622964938&from=export | Keywords: | amoxicillin plus clavulanic acidazithromycin;major clinical study;human;female;drug therapy;drug resistance;double blind procedure;disease exacerbation;coughing;controlled study;conference abstract;child;multicenter study;nonhuman;nose smear;outcome assessment;Parainfluenza virus infection;parallel design;quality of life;randomized controlled trial;Rhinovirus;risk factor;side effect;spirometry;substitution reaction;treatment failure;visually impaired person;bronchiectasis;placebo;male;adverse drug reaction | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.