Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1507
Title: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of three-dimensionally printed models for the classification of proximal humeral fractures
Authors: Bougher, Hannah
Buttner, Petra
Smith, Jonathon
Banks, Jennifer 
Na, Hyun Su
Forrestal, David
Heal, Clare 
Issue Date: Mar-2021
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
Source: Bougher, H., Buttner, P., Smith, J., Banks, J., Na, H. S., Forrestal, D., & Heal, C. (2021). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of three-dimensionally printed models for the classification of proximal humeral fractures. JSES International, 5(2), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.019
Journal: JSES international
Abstract: This study aimed to examine whether three-dimensionally printed models (3D models) could improve interobserver and intraobserver agreement when classifying proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) using the Neer system. We hypothesized that 3D models would improve interobserver and intraobserver agreement compared with x-ray, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and that agreement using 3D models would be higher for registrars than for consultants. Thirty consecutive PHF images were selected from a state-wide database and classified by fourteen observers. Each imaging modality (x-ray, 2D CT, 3D CT, 3D models) was grouped and presented in a randomly allocated sequence on two separate occasions. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were quantified with kappa values (κ), percentage agreement, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven orthopedic registrars and seven orthopedic consultants classified 30 fractures on one occasion (interobserver). Four registrars and three consultants additionally completed classification on a second occasion (intraobserver). Interobserver agreement was greater with 3D models than with x-ray (κ = 0.47, CI: 0.44-0.50, 66.5%, CI: 64.6-68.4% and κ = 0.29, CI: 0.26-0.31, 57.2%, CI: 55.1-59.3%, respectively), 2D CT (κ = 0.30, CI: 0.27-0.33, 57.8%, CI: 55.5-60.2%), and 3D CT (κ = 0.35, CI: 0.33-0.38, 58.8%, CI: 56.7-60.9%). Intraobserver agreement appeared higher for 3D models than for other modalities; however, results were not significant. There were no differences in interobserver or intraobserver agreement between registrars and consultants. Three-dimensionally printed models improved interobserver agreement in the classification of PHFs using the Neer system. This has potential implications for using 3D models for surgical planning and teaching.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.019
Keywords: Proximal humeral fracture;interobserver agreement;intraobserver agreement;3D modeling;fracture classification;Neer system
Type: Article
Appears in Sites:Mackay HHS Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

96
checked on Apr 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.