Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/11816
Title: ENHANCING MEDULLOBLASTOMA CLASSIFICATION: INTEGRATING IHC AND DNA METHYLATION DATA FROM THE SJMB12 CLINICAL TRIAL
Authors: Dhanda, S. K.;Breuer, A.;Tran, Q. T.;Smith, K.;Strother, D.;Fisher, M.;Bendel, A.;Hwang, E.;Zhao, S.;Gottardo, N.;Hassall, T. ;Elster, J.;Perreault, S.;Ramaswamy, V.;Partap, S.;Laughton, S.;Cohn, R.;Chintagumpala, M.;McCowage, G.;Sullivan, M.;Sayour, E.;Bowers, D. C.;Marks, A.;Wright, A.;Onar-Thomas, A.;Ellison, D.;Northcott, P. A.;Gajjar, A.;Robinson, G. W.;Orr, B. A.
Issue Date: 2025
Source: Neuro-Oncology, 2025 (27) p.v270
Pages: v270
Journal Title: Neuro-Oncology
Abstract: The SJMB12 trial used immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based molecular grouping to separate medulloblastoma (MB) into WNT, SHH, and non- WNT/non-SHH (NWNS) groups for risk and treatment stratification. IHC was selected due to its rapid turnaround, cost-effectiveness, and low-tech nature, which allowed its immediate implementation in a prospective clinical trial. Nevertheless, the accuracy and reproducibility of IHC on a prospective cohort were unknown. Here, we compared IHC-based MB molecular group assignment to DNA methylation profiling for 634 evaluable patients from the SJMB12 trial. Robust concordance was observed. All 88 IHC-defined WNT MBs were classified as WNT by methylation. Of 107 IHC-defined SHH MBs, 106 were identified as SHH. Furthermore, 390 (98%) of 398 IHC-defined NWNS cases were identified as Group 3 or Group 4 MBs. Discordant cases were minimal: one IHC-defined SHH tumor was reclassified as glioblastoma by methylation, and 8 IHC-defined NWNS cases were reclassified (SHH (n=4), Pineoblastoma (n=2), WNT (n=1), or unclassified (n=1)). The performance metrics for IHC across MB groups were robust. For WNT, sensitivity was 93.6%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 98.9%. For SHH, sensitivity was 89.1%, specificity 99.8%, PPV 99.1%, and NPV 97.5%. For NWNS (proxy for Group 3/4), sensitivity was 94.9%, specificity 96.4%, PPV 98.0%, and NPV 91.1%. Notably, 41 (6%) tumors could not be grouped by IHC and were placed into an “indeterminate” category. These were assigned by methylation profiling to WNT (n=5), SHH (n=9), Group 3 (n=20), Group 4 (n=1), medullomyoblastoma (n=5), and GBM (n=1). Intriguingly, these cases were not random; they were enriched in MBs belonging to Group 3 subgroup 2, displaying myogenic and/or melanotic differentiation, and TP53-mutated SHH tumors. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that IHC is a valuable tool for molecular grouping in medulloblastoma. Despite some limitations, it provides accurate results and, even when indeterminate, can reveal intriguing disease characteristics.
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/NOAF201.1072
Resources: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L649303242&from=export
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/NOAF201.1072
Type: Conference Abstract
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Queensland Health Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Oct 8, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.