Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/11816| Title: | ENHANCING MEDULLOBLASTOMA CLASSIFICATION: INTEGRATING IHC AND DNA METHYLATION DATA FROM THE SJMB12 CLINICAL TRIAL | Authors: | Dhanda, S. K.;Breuer, A.;Tran, Q. T.;Smith, K.;Strother, D.;Fisher, M.;Bendel, A.;Hwang, E.;Zhao, S.;Gottardo, N.;Hassall, T. ;Elster, J.;Perreault, S.;Ramaswamy, V.;Partap, S.;Laughton, S.;Cohn, R.;Chintagumpala, M.;McCowage, G.;Sullivan, M.;Sayour, E.;Bowers, D. C.;Marks, A.;Wright, A.;Onar-Thomas, A.;Ellison, D.;Northcott, P. A.;Gajjar, A.;Robinson, G. W.;Orr, B. A. | Issue Date: | 2025 | Source: | Neuro-Oncology, 2025 (27) p.v270 | Pages: | v270 | Journal Title: | Neuro-Oncology | Abstract: | The SJMB12 trial used immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based molecular grouping to separate medulloblastoma (MB) into WNT, SHH, and non- WNT/non-SHH (NWNS) groups for risk and treatment stratification. IHC was selected due to its rapid turnaround, cost-effectiveness, and low-tech nature, which allowed its immediate implementation in a prospective clinical trial. Nevertheless, the accuracy and reproducibility of IHC on a prospective cohort were unknown. Here, we compared IHC-based MB molecular group assignment to DNA methylation profiling for 634 evaluable patients from the SJMB12 trial. Robust concordance was observed. All 88 IHC-defined WNT MBs were classified as WNT by methylation. Of 107 IHC-defined SHH MBs, 106 were identified as SHH. Furthermore, 390 (98%) of 398 IHC-defined NWNS cases were identified as Group 3 or Group 4 MBs. Discordant cases were minimal: one IHC-defined SHH tumor was reclassified as glioblastoma by methylation, and 8 IHC-defined NWNS cases were reclassified (SHH (n=4), Pineoblastoma (n=2), WNT (n=1), or unclassified (n=1)). The performance metrics for IHC across MB groups were robust. For WNT, sensitivity was 93.6%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 98.9%. For SHH, sensitivity was 89.1%, specificity 99.8%, PPV 99.1%, and NPV 97.5%. For NWNS (proxy for Group 3/4), sensitivity was 94.9%, specificity 96.4%, PPV 98.0%, and NPV 91.1%. Notably, 41 (6%) tumors could not be grouped by IHC and were placed into an “indeterminate” category. These were assigned by methylation profiling to WNT (n=5), SHH (n=9), Group 3 (n=20), Group 4 (n=1), medullomyoblastoma (n=5), and GBM (n=1). Intriguingly, these cases were not random; they were enriched in MBs belonging to Group 3 subgroup 2, displaying myogenic and/or melanotic differentiation, and TP53-mutated SHH tumors. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that IHC is a valuable tool for molecular grouping in medulloblastoma. Despite some limitations, it provides accurate results and, even when indeterminate, can reveal intriguing disease characteristics. | DOI: | 10.1093/neuonc/NOAF201.1072 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L649303242&from=export http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/NOAF201.1072 |
Type: | Conference Abstract |
| Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications Queensland Health Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.