Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/11813| Title: | Energy doses for paediatric defibrillation in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis | Authors: | Acworth, J.;Del Castillo, J.;Tiwari, L. K.;Atkins, D.;de Caen, A.;Bansal, A.;Couto, T. B.;Katzenschlager, S.;Kleinman, M.;Lopez-Herce, J.;Morgan, R. W.;Myburgh, M.;Nadkarni, V.;Tijssen, J. A.;Scholefield, B. R. | Issue Date: | 2025 | Source: | Resusc Plus, 2025 (24) p.100991 | Pages: | 100991 | Journal Title: | Resusc Plus | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Early defibrillation is the foundation of treatment of shockable ventricular arrhythmias (VF, pVT) but optimal energy doses for initial and subsequent shocks in paediatric cardiac arrest remain controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of different energy doses for initial defibrillation in infants, children and adolescents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during cardiac arrest. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by the ILCOR Paediatric Life Support Task force. This systematic review was prospectively registered as PROSPERO CRD42024548898. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) was performed for clinical trials and observational studies, published before 1 January 2025, involving cardiac defibrillation in infants and children (excluding newborn infants) in cardiac arrest. Investigators reviewed studies for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I framework. Critical outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Results were compiled into a Summary of Findings table using the GRADEpro Guideline Development tool. Statistical calculations and Forest plot generation were performed using RevMan. RESULTS: We identified 7 relevant observational studies. The majority of studies involved in-hospital cardiac arrest. The overall certainty of evidence was very low. Critical (survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation) and important (termination of VF/pVT) outcomes were not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg were used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The current available data suggest that outcomes are not significantly better or worse when initial defibrillation doses of <1.5 J/kg or >2.5 J/kg are used for children in cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm (VF or pVT) compared with initial doses approximating 2 J/kg. Well-designed randomised trials are needed to address this important question. | DOI: | 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100991 |
| Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications Queensland Health Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.