Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/10809| Title: | The Clock Is Not Enough: The Clock Drawing Test versus the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment for Detecting Dementia in Older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adults | Authors: | Zanker, Jesse Hyde, Zoë Smith, Kate Bessarab, Dawn Bradley, Kate Douglas, Harry Hughson, Jo-Anne Nguyen, Huong Malay, Rosyln Quigley, Rachel Radford, Kylie Russell, Sarah Smith, Robyn A Werdiger, Freda Strivens, Edward Flicker, Leon LoGiudice, Dina |
Issue Date: | 2025 | Source: | Zanker J, Hyde Z, Smith K, Bessarab D, Bradley K, Douglas H, Hughson JA, Nguyen H, Malay R, Quigley R, Radford K, Russell S, Smith RA, Werdiger F, Strivens E, Flicker L, LoGiudice D. The Clock Is Not Enough: The Clock Drawing Test versus the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment for Detecting Dementia in Older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adults. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2025 Sep 15:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000548440. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40952950. | Journal Title: | Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders | Journal: | Dementia and Geriatrics Cognitive Disorders | Abstract: | We aimed to explore the performance of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment - Cognitive component (KICA-Cog) and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with dementia and without dementia in the Let's CHAT Dementia study. In this cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study, participants completed Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments. Demographic, health, cognitive, and functional histories, and cognitive assessments (KICA-Cog and CDT) were recorded. The reference standard was consensus diagnosis by two geriatricians blinded to KICA-Cog and CDT performance. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses explored accuracy against a diagnosis of dementia. Seventy-five adults with a median age of 74 years (interquartile range 65, 78) were assessed, of whom 39 (52.0%) were women. Forty-seven (62.7%) had normal cognition, 15 (20.0%) had cognitive impairment no dementia, and 13 (17.3%) had dementia. Sixty-one (81.3%) participants had completed primary school, and 13 (17.3%) had completed secondary school. People with dementia were older (p = 0.046), but no differences were found for gender, comorbidities, or education. KICA-Cog and CDT scores were inversely associated with dementia in unadjusted and fully adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% CI [0.26-0.71] and OR = 0.18 [0.07-0.51], respectively). The KICA-Cog was superior to the CDT for classifying dementia in participants, with area under the curve (95% CI) = 0.98 (0.95-1.00); versus 0.79 (0.64-0.93), respectively, p < 0.001. The optimal KICA-Cog cutpoint for classifying dementia was ≤34, with 92.3% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity. KICA-Cog is superior to CDT at classifying dementia when used with older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults and should, therefore, be prioritised over the CDT for cognitive screening in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. | Description: | Cairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated authors: Rachel Quigley, Sarah Russell, Edward Strivens | DOI: | 10.1159/000548440 | Keywords: | Cognitive screening test;Aboriginal and torres strait islander;Indigenous populations;Cognitive assessment;Dementia;Culturally appropriate cognitive assessment | Type: | Journal article |
| Appears in Sites: | Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications Queensland Health Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.