Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/10809
Title: The Clock Is Not Enough: The Clock Drawing Test versus the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment for Detecting Dementia in Older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adults
Authors: Zanker, Jesse
Hyde, Zoë
Smith, Kate
Bessarab, Dawn
Bradley, Kate
Douglas, Harry
Hughson, Jo-Anne
Nguyen, Huong
Malay, Rosyln
Quigley, Rachel 
Radford, Kylie
Russell, Sarah 
Smith, Robyn A
Werdiger, Freda
Strivens, Edward 
Flicker, Leon
LoGiudice, Dina
Issue Date: 2025
Source: Zanker J, Hyde Z, Smith K, Bessarab D, Bradley K, Douglas H, Hughson JA, Nguyen H, Malay R, Quigley R, Radford K, Russell S, Smith RA, Werdiger F, Strivens E, Flicker L, LoGiudice D. The Clock Is Not Enough: The Clock Drawing Test versus the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment for Detecting Dementia in Older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adults. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2025 Sep 15:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000548440. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40952950.
Journal Title: Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders
Journal: Dementia and Geriatrics Cognitive Disorders
Abstract: We aimed to explore the performance of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment - Cognitive component (KICA-Cog) and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with dementia and without dementia in the Let's CHAT Dementia study. In this cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study, participants completed Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments. Demographic, health, cognitive, and functional histories, and cognitive assessments (KICA-Cog and CDT) were recorded. The reference standard was consensus diagnosis by two geriatricians blinded to KICA-Cog and CDT performance. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses explored accuracy against a diagnosis of dementia. Seventy-five adults with a median age of 74 years (interquartile range 65, 78) were assessed, of whom 39 (52.0%) were women. Forty-seven (62.7%) had normal cognition, 15 (20.0%) had cognitive impairment no dementia, and 13 (17.3%) had dementia. Sixty-one (81.3%) participants had completed primary school, and 13 (17.3%) had completed secondary school. People with dementia were older (p = 0.046), but no differences were found for gender, comorbidities, or education. KICA-Cog and CDT scores were inversely associated with dementia in unadjusted and fully adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% CI [0.26-0.71] and OR = 0.18 [0.07-0.51], respectively). The KICA-Cog was superior to the CDT for classifying dementia in participants, with area under the curve (95% CI) = 0.98 (0.95-1.00); versus 0.79 (0.64-0.93), respectively, p < 0.001. The optimal KICA-Cog cutpoint for classifying dementia was ≤34, with 92.3% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity. KICA-Cog is superior to CDT at classifying dementia when used with older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults and should, therefore, be prioritised over the CDT for cognitive screening in older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Description: Cairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service (CHHHS) affiliated authors: Rachel Quigley, Sarah Russell, Edward Strivens
DOI: 10.1159/000548440
Keywords: Cognitive screening test;Aboriginal and torres strait islander;Indigenous populations;Cognitive assessment;Dementia;Culturally appropriate cognitive assessment
Type: Journal article
Appears in Sites:Cairns & Hinterland HHS Publications
Queensland Health Publications

Show full item record

Page view(s)

208
checked on Jan 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.