Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/835
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Den
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Sen
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Ren
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Men
dc.contributor.authorBond, Cen
dc.contributor.authorLintern, Nen
dc.contributor.authorFraser-Kirk, Ken
dc.contributor.authorWiltshire, Den
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-17T21:11:00Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-17T21:11:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.citation132, (3), 2018, p. 240-245en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/835-
dc.languageenen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Laryngology & Otologyen
dc.titleThe debate continues: a prospective, randomised, single-blind study comparing Coblation and bipolar tonsillectomy techniquesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.risid148en
dc.description.pages240-245en
Appears in Collections:West Moreton
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.